Wednesday, March 31, 2021

DAY 4 – The Chief Priests and Scribes Seek the Death of Jesus: and who is that woman? (Mk 14:1-11)

 

Earlier in Mark’s Gospel Jesus had “cleansed the Temple” and admonished the temple authorities and scribes saying, “My house shall be called a house of prayer for all the nations,” and rebuked them for making it “a den of robbers” (11:15-17).  Even that day the authorities were “looking for a way to kill him” (v. 18).  Later, they want to arrest him when they realize the Parable of the Wicked Tenants was spoken against them (12:12).  Now two days before the Passover and the festival of Unleavened Bread, the chief priests, and the scribes are looking for a way to arrest him through treachery and kill him before the feast (14:1-2).  While they seek to destroy him, an unnamed woman in Bethany anoints Jesus before his death and burial; Jesus says, “wherever the good news is proclaimed in the whole world, what she has done will be told in the remembrance of her” (v. 9).  In the meantime, Judas Iscariot went to the chief priests to hand him over to them (vv. 10-11). 

 

My question is who is that woman?  She is remarkable!  Matthew’s parallel account is also nameless (Matt 26:6-13).  In a close parallel account in the Gospel of John, Mary of Bethany anoints Jesus’ feet (12:3).  In Luke’s Gospel, which appears to be an entirely different account, happening at a different point in Jesus’ ministry, and takes place in a different home, a sinful woman anoints and bathes Jesus, “kissing his feet and anointing them with ointment” (Lk 7:37-38).  In the 6th century, Gregory the Great associates the woman in Luke 7 as Mary Magdalene (Homily 33.1).

Jerome argues that the woman in Mark 14 is not the same woman in Luke 7.  He also points out a dichotomy.  It was not the priest and scribes in the temple who had ointment to anoint Jesus, rather it is the woman in Mark 14 who is outside the temple who carries a jar of ointment for anointing Jesus (Homily 84).  

People gathered outside the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem, Israel (2017 Israel Trip) LFL


Tuesday, March 30, 2021

Day 3: Jesus and Lessons from the Fig Tree and from the Mountain (Mk 11:20-25)

Jesus had cursed the fig tree the day before because it was not bearing fruit.  Today the tree has withered away to its roots (Mk11:20-21).  An irony has been noted that this time of the year was not the season for a fig tree to bear fruit.  In the Hebrew Scriptures, the fig tree is used as a metaphor for Israel among the prophets (Hos 9:10: Jer 24:1-10; see also 8:13, Micah 4:4).

Morna Hooker has argued, “the incident of the fig tree is a difficult one. It is the only ‘negative’ miracle in the gospels....The story is dismissed by some commentators as out of character for Jesus....Whatever its origins...the story is certainly used symbolically by Mark and probably had this symbolic significance from the beginning. The fig tree represents Israel, which has failed to produce the appropriate fruits when her Messiah looked for them” (The Gospel According to Saint Mark, 261).

Raymond Brown notes, “to curse the tree because it had no fruit seems to many irrational since, as Mark reminds us, this time just before Passover was not the season for figs. However, the cursing is similar to the prophetic actions of the OT whose very peculiarity attracts attention to the message being symbolically presented (Jer 19:1–2, 10–11; Ezek 12:1–7). The barren tree represents those Jewish authorities whose failures are illustrated in the intervening action of cleansing the Temple, which has been made a den of thieves instead of a house of prayer for all peoples (Jer 7:11; Isa 56:7). In particular, the chief priests and the scribes seek to put Jesus to death, and their future punishment is symbolized by the withering of the tree. The miraculous element in the cursing/withering becomes in 11:22–25 the occasion for Jesus to give the disciples a lesson in faith and the power of prayer. (The instruction to the disciples to forgive in order that God may forgive them resembles a motif that Matt 6:12 places in the Lord’s Prayer.)[1]

N.T Wright makes this unique observation:

In Mark and Matthew, Jesus’ Temple-action is closely linked with the cursing of the fig tree. As has often been remarked, this has the effect of using one acted symbol to interpret another. In this case, though, the symbol is further interpreted by a riddling saying:

Whoever says to this mountain, ‘Be taken up and cast into the sea’, and does not doubt in his heart, but believes that what he says will come to pass, it will happen for him.

We have already commented that ‘this mountain’, spoken in Jerusalem in the vicinity of the Temple, would naturally refer to the Temple mount itself. There is, however, a biblical allusion which suggests that the saying was also a cryptic messianic riddle. Zechariah 1–8 is all about the return from exile, the restoration of Jerusalem, the return of yhwh to Zion, and the rebuilding of the Temple; and, not surprisingly, about the coming anointed ones, the priest and the king. Zerubbabel is the Davidic figure on whom the prophet rests his hopes for the rebuilding of the Temple, despite all opposition; and, to symbolize that opposition, he uses the image of the great mountain, perhaps (as in other passages in Zechariah 1–8) echoing Isaiah 40, which speaks of the mountains and hills being flattened at the coming of yhwh:

He said to me, ‘This is the word of yhwh to Zerubbabel: Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, says yhwh of hosts. What are you, O great mountain? Before Zerubbabel you shall become a plain; and he shall bring out the top stone amid shouts of “Grace, grace to it!” ’

I suggest, therefore, that the saying about the mountain has a double thrust. First, it emphasizes that Jesus’ action signified the overthrow of the Temple; second, it pointed to Jesus as the one who would at last do what Zerubbabel was supposed to do, that is, to be the true anointed one who would build the true Temple. Whatever the ‘mountain’ may have signified in Zechariah’s   prophecy, it was clearly something that stood in the way of the building of the Temple. Thus, in Jesus’ riddle, (a) the present Temple is seen as in opposition to the true one, (b) the present Temple will be destroyed, to make way for the true one, and (c) Jesus is the true anointed one, who will bring out the top stone of the building and thus complete it. Once again, the Temple-action lays claim to royalty.[2]



[1] Raymond E. Brown, An Introduction to the New Testament (New York: Doubleday, 1997), 142–143.

[2] N. T. Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God (Christian Origins and the Question of God; London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1996), 494–495.

Temple Mount in the Background (2017 Israel Trip) LFL


Monday, March 29, 2021

Day 2: Jesus and Second Temple Judaism: The so called "Cleansing of the Temple" and the saying "My house shall be called a house of prayer for all the nations."

 Then they came to Jerusalem. And he entered the temple and began to drive out those who were selling and those who were buying in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those who sold doves;  and he would not allow anyone to carry anything through the temple.  He was teaching and saying, “Is it not written, 

    ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer for all the nations’? 

    But you have made it a den of robbers.” 

And when the chief priests and the scribes heard it, they kept looking for a way to kill him; for they were afraid of him, because the whole crowd was spellbound by his teaching.  And when evening came, Jesus and his disciples went out of the city (Mk 11:15-19: NRSV). 

__________________________________________________

This action in the Temple has been interpreted in a variety of ways—for example, a symbol of coming destruction, the symbol of coming restoration, and a forerunner of the coming new institution.  Dominic Crossan argued that the action in the Temple is “a deliberate symbolic attack.  It destroys the Temple by stopping its fiscal, sacrificial, and liturgical operations...[This] symbolic destruction simply actualized what he had already said in his teachings, affected in his healings, and realized in his mission of open commensality.”[i]  N. T. Wright holds the view that Jesus’ action was a prophetic critique of the present Temple, and that the action symbolized its imminent destruction.[ii]  E. P. Sanders argued that Jesus’ action both “symbolized destruction” and also looked “toward restoration.”[iii]  According to Sanders, Jesus “did not wish to purify the temple, either of dishonest trading or of trading in contrast to ‘pure’ worship. Nor was he opposed to the temple sacrifices which God commanded to Israel. He intended, rather, to indicate that the end was at hand and that the temple would be destroyed, so that the new and perfect temple might arise.”[iv]  Like Sanders, who tried to move beyond the theme of destruction, several scholars have suggested the movement beyond desolation towards the establishment of the new institution of the Eucharist.[v] 

After looking at the Mishnah, the Tosefta, and Exodus 30:16, Jacob Neusner realizes that the money-changers performed a vital service for the daily whole-offering to be offered up in the name of the Jewish community in the Jewish Temple.  This has a remarkable significance for understanding Jesus’ action in the Temple.  When Jesus enters the Temple and overturns the table of the money-changers, this action is a prelude to a later event in the life and ministry of Jesus.  Jesus overturns one table to establish another.  The place of sacrifice for the atonement of sins will no longer be centered on the Jewish Temple; rather, the place of sacrifice will focus on the person of Jesus.[vi]  According to Neusner,

“It was to be the rite of the Eucharist: table for table, whole offering for whole offering. It...seems to me that the correct context in which to read the overturning of the money-changers’ tables is not the destruction of the Temple in general, but the institution of the sacrifice of the [E]ucharist, in particular.”[vii]



[i] Dominic Crossan, Jesus: A Revolutionary Biography (New York: HarperCollins, 1995), 131, 133.

[ii] N. T. Wright, Jesus and The Victory of God, 417-418.

[iii] Sanders, Jesus and Judaism, 69-71.

[iv] Sanders, Jesus and Judaism, 75.

[v] The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide (trans. J. Bowden; ed. G. Theissen and A. Merz: Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1998 [Ger. 1996]), 431-439;* Jacob Neusner, “Money-Changers in the Temple: The Mishnah’s Explanation,” NTS 35.2 (1989): 287–90; Bruce Chilton, The Temple of Jesus: His Sacrificial Program within a Cultural History of Sacrifice (University Park, Pennsylvania:  1992), 92- 154; A Feast of Meanings: Eucharistic Theologies from Jesus through Johannine Circles (Leiden; New York: Brill, 1994); Jostein Ådna, “Jesus’ Symbolic Act in the Temple (Mark 11:15-17): The Replacement of the Sacrificial Cult by His Atoning Death,” Gemeinde ohne Tempel: Community without Temple (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 118; ed. B. Ego, A. Lange and P. Pilhofer; Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1999), 461-476.*

[vi] Jacob Neusner, “Money-Changers in the Temple: The Mishnah’s Explanation,” NTS 35.2 (1989): 287–290.

[vii] Neusner, “Money-Changers in the Temple,” 290.






Sunday, March 28, 2021

Day 1: Jesus and the Second Jewish Temple: Last Week in Jerusalem According to Gospel of Mark (Sunday)

When they were approaching Jerusalem, at Bethphage and Bethany, near the Mount of Olives, he sent two of his disciples and said to them, “Go into the village ahead of you, and immediately as you enter it, you will find tied there a colt that has never been ridden; untie it and bring it. If anyone says to you, ‘Why are you doing this?’ just say this, ‘The Lord needs it and will send it back here immediately.’ ” They went away and found a colt tied near a door, outside in the street. As they were untying it, some of the bystanders said to them, “What are you doing, untying the colt?”  They told them what Jesus had said; and they allowed them to take it.  Then they brought the colt to Jesus and threw their cloaks on it; and he sat on it.  Many people spread their cloaks on the road, and others spread leafy branches that they had cut in the fields.  Then those who went ahead and those who followed were shouting, 

    “Hosanna! 

    Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord! 

    Blessed is the coming kingdom of our ancestor David! 

    Hosanna in the highest heaven!” 

Then he entered Jerusalem and went into the temple; and when he had looked around at everything, as it was already late, he went out to Bethany with the twelve (Mk 11:1-11: NRSV). 

Eastern Gate to the Temple Mount in the upper right corner of the picture (Israel Trip 2017)



Sunday, March 14, 2021

You Must Wait for Me (1 Nisan 5781) Fourth Sunday of Lent March 14, 2020

 Edited March 16, 2021

I was thinking and praying about God’s signs and wonders among all peoples, nations, tongues, and tribes.  I hear a still small voice, “you must wait for me.”  I later hear the simple word “wedding.”  I searched out the saying, “you must wait for me” and found it in Hosea 3:3 (Douay-Rheims Bible; see also NJB).  The Hebrew text has the verb יָשַׁב (yāšab), meaning “sit, remain, dwell” (TWOT 411).  The NRSV has the following:

The Lord said to me again, “Go, love a woman who has a lover and is an adulteress, just as the Lord loves the people of Israel, though they turn to other gods and love raisin cakes.” So I bought her for fifteen shekels of silver and a homer of barley and a measure of wine.  And I said to her, “You must remain as mine for many days; you shall not play the whore, you shall not have intercourse with a man, nor I with you.”  For the Israelites shall remain many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or pillar, without ephod or teraphim.  Afterward the Israelites shall return and seek the Lord their God, and David their king; they shall come in awe to the Lord and to his goodness in the latter days (Hos 3:1-5).

I see parallels between what is above and Habakkuk.

        O Lord, I have heard of your renown,

and I stand in awe, O Lord, of your work.

   In our own time revive it;

in our own time make it known;

in wrath may you remember mercy (3:2). 

Finally, I recall the prayer to God of Pope John XXIII in 1962 that began, “Renew Your wonders in this our day, as by a new Pentecost….” 

It seems then that there are two important dimensions: 1) the individual who seeks, watches, and prays for God’s renewal/revival; 2) the Almighty God who brings it about in his timing.    



Olive trees in the Garden of Gethsemane 

What looks like a heart sitting within a heart among the olive trees east of the Temple Mount/Harm al-Sharif in Jerusalem, Israel.  



Thursday, March 11, 2021

Jordanian Crown Prince Cancels Pre-planned Temple Mount Visit

 


THE JERUSALEM POST
:
Jordanian Crown Prince Hussein bin Abdullah canceled a pre-planned Wednesday visit to the Temple Mount after Jordan failed to uphold the agreed security arrangement with Israel, KAN 11 reported. 

The Jordanians were limited to a set number of security guards but eventually decided to bring a larger number.

When Israel insisted they stick to the agreed upon number, the Jordanians decided to cancel the visit.

The security of diplomatic guests visiting a country is on the shoulders of the hosting nation, in this case, Israel. 

The Hashemite Kingdom has a historic relationship with Jerusalem and its holy sites, including the Temple Mount, known as al-Haram al-Sharif. Jordan controlled east Jerusalem from 1948-1967, including the Old City.

Drawing by L. Gummadi, Agamim Academy 

Indigenous Leaders in Solidarity with Historical Jewish Connection to the Land of Israel

This news article took me by surprise.   A group of indigenous leaders gathered in Jerusalem from around the world to support the historical...